Page 2 of 2

Re: Compressing files

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 1:27 pm
by borntworide
bi4.JPG
bi4.JPG (68.46 KiB) Viewed 5393 times

Re: Compressing files

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:45 pm
by HeneryH
Not even sure where this conversation started but you will surely spark discussion about how 30 fps is way too high for anything other than trying to catch magician card thieves in Vegas.

But with these numbers and a simple Excel sheet you can calculate the storage required for any given number of days.

Re: Compressing files

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:49 pm
by Matts1984
HeneryH wrote: Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:45 pm Not even sure where this conversation started but you will surely spark discussion about how 30 fps is way too high for anything other than trying to catch magician card thieves in Vegas.

But with these numbers and a simple Excel sheet you can calculate the storage required for any given number of days.
+1 Cutting 30 FPS to 15 on each camera immediately halves the storage required and I don't think you'd actually see that much of a difference in the image (but as a side benefit, should result in large CPU gains)

Re: Compressing files

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:43 pm
by borntworide
Thank you !! should i set them at the camera or in BI?

Re: Compressing files

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:49 pm
by HeneryH
In the camera.

Re: Compressing files

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:49 pm
by borntworide
I set all the mainstream to 15 , do i need to worry about sub-stream?

Re: Compressing files

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:56 pm
by HeneryH
only if you use the substream.

Re: Compressing files

Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:37 pm
by Matts1984
borntworide wrote: Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:49 pm I set all the mainstream to 15 , do i need to worry about sub-stream?
It doesn't look like you're currently using sub-streams. I'm not aware of many instances in which sub-streams were not ideal, they're quite recommended and can go to further significantly help CPU usage. I'm not sure how you're doing in that department. I believe I have read a couple community members not use/want them but I definitely do. In a nutshell, if using substreams - BI does it's processing and monitoring on the lower res sub-stream which is still more than sufficient for most real world applications. Videos are still recorded at main-stream quality and viewing in the console - depends. If you just have the screen up (console or UI3) it will use the substreams, which I think you will notice that unless you're using an insanely largely and high quality monitor... is still pretty good. Selecting a stream or making it full screen will automatically switch over to the mainstream in a second or so. All this doesn't really help out storage, and slightly increases load on the network (more streams but overall, the sub doesn't add that much) but can dramatically improve CPU usage.

I'd recommend getting everything else to a good state and then try adding it to one camera at a time. Sometimes figuring out the path configuration for the substream is a challenge for some of the knock-off cameras out there but overall it's very simple.